Friday, January 07, 2011
Ruby: The Polite Programmer's Guide to Ruby Etiquette
One of the good Ruby Conference 2010 presentation. The Polite Programmer's Guide to Ruby Etiquette
Saturday, January 01, 2011
Web: Year & Month selector
Three weekends back I started my weekend project ExpenseBook to track my personal expenses and was looking for jQuery plugin to select date for expense entries. Almost all of my google search ended up in calendar style plugins which are very common and I was not able to convince my self to use them. So I decided to design and code myself. Since I had lot of space to fit this piece, I came up with this design.
What I liked about this design is:
Below is html, css and jQuery code to make this working. (Note: Years and months in html are hard coded for this post. In real application, they are auto generated.)
What I liked about this design is:
- jumping between months is much quicker: single click or single tap on my iPhone (unless I don't want to change year)
- entering day of month is much quicker by typing on keyboard than clicking and selecting.
- it fits nicely in overall page design.
Below is html, css and jQuery code to make this working. (Note: Years and months in html are hard coded for this post. In real application, they are auto generated.)
Tuesday, December 07, 2010
Convert time to EST
Code to convert given time in UTC milliseconds to EST, irrespective of timezone of environment in which code executes.
Mockito: verify order of invocations
Sometimes there is need to verify the order of invocations happened on mock object. Take a look at below
Here, we want to verify that in ideal case
At first this test seems to be verifying what is suppose to, but unfortunately this test will not detect if
This is because
To make test verify invocation order, Mockito provides
If the order of invocation is changed in
Below is complete code.
RequestProcessor class. This class reads request from input stream, does some processing, write response to output stream and closes the connection. public class RequestProcessor {
private Socket socket;
public RequestProcessor(Socket socket) {
this.socket = socket;
}
public void process() {
try {
InputStream is = socket.getInputStream();
String response = processRequest(is);
PrintWriter pw = new PrintWriter(socket.getOutputStream());
pw.append(response);
pw.flush();
} catch (IOException e) {
// catch exception
} finally {
try {
socket.close();
} catch (IOException e) {}
}
}
private String processRequest(InputStream is) {
// process request and send response
}
}
Here, we want to verify that in ideal case
RequestProcessor should first read request from socket.getInputStream() and then after processing request, write response in socket.getOutputStream(). One way that comes in mind is to write test as:@Test public void socketClosedInIdealCase() throws IOException {
ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
ByteArrayInputStream bais = new ByteArrayInputStream("a=b+c".getBytes());
when(socketMock.getInputStream()).thenReturn(bais);
when(socketMock.getOutputStream()).thenReturn(baos);
RequestProcessor request = new RequestProcessor(socketMock);
request.process();
// verify method invocations
verify(socketMock).getInputStream();
verify(socketMock).getOutputStream();
}
At first this test seems to be verifying what is suppose to, but unfortunately this test will not detect if
socket.getOutputStream() is moved before socket.getInputStream() as done in below code.public void process() {
try {
OutputStream os = socket.getOutputStream()
InputStream is = socket.getInputStream();
String response = processRequest(is);
// rest of the code
} catch (IOException e) {
// catch exception
} finally {
try {
socket.close();
} catch (IOException e) {}
}
}
}
This is because
Mockito.verify() static method only verifies whether any invocation happened on mock object. It does not verifies order of invocation. To make test verify invocation order, Mockito provides
Mockito.inOrder static method. Using this method above test can be rewritten as:@Test public void socketClosedInIdealCase() throws IOException {
ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
ByteArrayInputStream bais = new ByteArrayInputStream("a=b+c".getBytes());
when(socketMock.getInputStream()).thenReturn(bais);
when(socketMock.getOutputStream()).thenReturn(baos);
RequestProcessor request = new RequestProcessor(socketMock);
request.process();
// verify method invocations
InOrder order = inOrder(socketMock);
order.verify(socketMock).getInputStream();
order.verify(socketMock).getOutputStream();
}
If the order of invocation is changed in
RequestProcessor.process() method, this test will fail.Below is complete code.
Thursday, December 02, 2010
Mockito: Two simple ways to create mock
Mockito is the simplest, cleanest and easiest to start with among other mocking frameworks present in java world. Being so simple, it still tries to make our test more cleaner and readable by providing two simple ways to create mocks depending upon the need. Let's look into those.
1. Using static
This is most common way to create mock. But what if mock is to be created and used in each test method in test class? One way to do is declare it as field and initialize it before test method is called. Something like this:
This looks simple and clean, but what if there are more than one field to be mocked? Create mock for each in
2. Using @Mock annotation
So when to use #1 and #2? As listed in java docs of
1. Using static
mock methodSocket socketMock = mock(Socket.class);
This is most common way to create mock. But what if mock is to be created and used in each test method in test class? One way to do is declare it as field and initialize it before test method is called. Something like this:
public class RequestProcessorTest {
private Socket socketMock;
@Before public void init() {
socketMock = mock(Socket.class);
}
}
This looks simple and clean, but what if there are more than one field to be mocked? Create mock for each in
init(). It's simple. But is there more simpler way to combine declaration and initialization process? Yes! that takes us to second point.2. Using @Mock annotation
@Mock annotation is shorthand for creating mock. This code shows how to create mocks using annotation.public class RequestProcessorTest {
@Mock private Socket socketMock;
@Before public void initMock() {
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
}
}
MockitoAnnotations.initMocks() is important here. It initializes all fields with @Mock annotation. In above code it creates mock of Socket and assigns it to socketMock. Using @Mock annotation has below listed advantages( as specified in mockito java docs): - Minimizes repetitive mock creation code.
- Makes the test class more readable.
- Makes the verification error easier to read because the field name is used to identify the mock.
So when to use #1 and #2? As listed in java docs of
@Mock annotation, if mock creation code is repetitive, I prefer to use #2 otherwise #1.
Wednesday, December 01, 2010
Why Ruby?
I don't completely agree with the presenter on monkey patching and Java, but was an interesting presentation.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
dup and clone: What's the difference?
dup and clone are used in ruby to create duplicate/clone of an object. So what's the difference between them? They differ in how they operate on frozen object. When frozen object is cloned using clone, the cloned object remains frozen, while when frozen object is duplicated using dup, the duplicated object is not frozen.Saturday, November 27, 2010
Ruby: freezing your object
Before diving in, lets look into what are mutable and immutable objects.
In ruby object can be made immutable anytime using
Once
Ruby also provides
One important point to take a note about
So where can
Mutable object is object that can be modified anytime during its life time. Immutable object is object that cannot be modified after it is created.
In ruby object can be made immutable anytime using
freeze method. Once the object is frozen, it cannot be modified further in its life time. Any attempt to modify frozen object results in TypeError. Let's take a look at simple example of freezing a string object.Once
str is frozen there is no way it can be unfrozen. Ruby also provides
frozen? method to check whether object is frozen or not.One important point to take a note about
freeze method here is that freeze makes object immutable and not object reference variable. Take a look at below code. obj1 and obj3 points to one instance of FreezeTest and obj2 points to another instance of FreezeTest. Once obj1.freeze is invoked, instance of FreezeTest to which obj1 and obj3 are pointing is frozen and not obj1 and obj3 variables. Both these variables can be modified to point to any other instance as seen in above code.So where can
freeze method be useful? Two places I can think of- Creating a true constant object: By true constant, I mean constant variable that refer to immutable object. Lets take example from rails. request.rb defines LOCALHOST constant as
LOCALHOST = [/^127\.0\.0\.\d{1,3}$/, "::1", /^0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1(%.*)?$/].freeze
By freezing array to which LOCALHOST points, rails makes sure that no one should be able to modify definition of localhost by removing and adding elements to array.
- Using object as hash key: Once object is used as hash key, we want to make sure that it's hash is not changed otherwise it will be difficult to find value associated with it. One of the way to achieve this is by freezing object and then using it as hash key.
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Google App Engine, things to know
Goodbye Google App Engine (GAE) provides some details one should be aware before starting using GAE as platform for new killer web app.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Using ActiveRecord without Rails
Following ruby code shows how to use active record in non rails environment.
Contents of database.yml:
Contents of database.yml:
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
Friday, February 04, 2005
Encapsulation is not information hiding
Excellent article describing the difference between Encapsulation and Information hiding with real life example. Read it.
Monday, January 24, 2005
Saturday, January 15, 2005
ROWNUM Pseudocolumn with ORDER BY
In Oracle to limit the number of rows return we use ROWNUM in the WHERE clause. Suppose if we want first 10 rows of emp table, then the sql query will be something like
SELECT id, name FROM emp WHERE ROWNUM < = 10
And if we want sorted result then might be ( as i thought for first time)
SELECT id, name FROM emp WHERE ROWNUM < = 10 ORDER BY name
The above query does not work as we want. The WHERE clause is applied before the ORDER BY clause. Oracle picks the first 10 rows and then applies ORDER BY on them. We need to first sort the data and then select the first 10 rows. Here is the query:
SELECT id, name FROM (SELECT id, name FROM emp ORDER BY name) WHERE ROWNUM<=10
You have to do this if the column in ORDER BY clause is non-primary key. If the column is primary key then simple query will do. Look at the below sql query
SELECT id, name FROM emp WHERE ROWNUM < = 10 ORDER BY id DESC
here id is primary key.
Also one more thing i noticed that we cannot use greater than(>) operator with ROWNUM. The query returns zero rows.
SELECT id, name FROM emp WHERE ROWNUM < = 10
And if we want sorted result then might be ( as i thought for first time)
SELECT id, name FROM emp WHERE ROWNUM < = 10 ORDER BY name
The above query does not work as we want. The WHERE clause is applied before the ORDER BY clause. Oracle picks the first 10 rows and then applies ORDER BY on them. We need to first sort the data and then select the first 10 rows. Here is the query:
SELECT id, name FROM (SELECT id, name FROM emp ORDER BY name) WHERE ROWNUM<=10
You have to do this if the column in ORDER BY clause is non-primary key. If the column is primary key then simple query will do. Look at the below sql query
SELECT id, name FROM emp WHERE ROWNUM < = 10 ORDER BY id DESC
here id is primary key.
Also one more thing i noticed that we cannot use greater than(>) operator with ROWNUM. The query returns zero rows.
Tuesday, December 28, 2004
Design Vs. Architecture
Weblog showing the difference between Design and Architecture.
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=84070
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=84070
Thinking about objects
Nice weblog, discussing whether one can make sense of the objects in the langauge independent way.
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=85308
http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=85308
Wednesday, September 01, 2004
Overriding validate() method for Containers.
I found an interesting problem when overriding the validate() method of the JPanel. I wanted to do some operation when the size of the parent changes. But when the program was executed nothing happened. The validate() method was not called. Where was the problem???????
Actually the answer lies in the validateTree() method of Container class . The validate() method is called only for the Containers which are Window otherwise the validateTree() method is called. So the flow is something like this :
So if your Component is Window then override validate() method otherwise override validateTree() method.
Actually the answer lies in the validateTree() method of Container class . The validate() method is called only for the Containers which are Window otherwise the validateTree() method is called. So the flow is something like this :
validate() method of Container calls the validateTree(), which in turn calls the validate() if Container is Window otherwise validateTree().
So if your Component is Window then override validate() method otherwise override validateTree() method.
Wednesday, July 07, 2004
Using SAX Parser from validating XML document in Java 1.4
By default the SAX parser does not validate the XML document against DTD.
To validate a XML document, call
Your handler class must override
The default implementation of
In xml document
Example:
The below given java example prints the element in the console as they are encountered. If the example is executed with
If the error method is removed from the code, both the xml documents(invalidbooks.xml and validbooks.xml)is parsered without any exception.
DTD:
validbooks.xml
invalidbooks.xml
Java Program:
To validate a XML document, call
setValidating(true) on SAXParserFactory instance.
Your handler class must override
error(SAXParseException e) method of the DefaultHandler to throw an exception (see the example below). If you don't do this your xml document will be parsed and client(user/other program) will not know about the exception. The SAX parser calls this method if any error occurs while parsing. It is the responsibility of the handler writer to make this exception available to the external world.
The default implementation of
error method is empty(i.e. it does not perform any operation).
In xml document
DOCTYPE should be included. The parser takes the DTD from the DOCTYPE.
Example:
The below given java example prints the element in the console as they are encountered. If the example is executed with
validbooks.xml no exception is thrown. But if the invalidbooks.xml is used exception will be thrown for <abc> tag.
If the error method is removed from the code, both the xml documents(invalidbooks.xml and validbooks.xml)is parsered without any exception.
DTD:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!ELEMENT age (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT book (person+)>
<!ELEMENT first (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT last (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT person (first,last,age)>
validbooks.xml
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE book SYSTEM "books.dtd">
<book>
<person>
<first>Kiran</first>
<last>Pai</last>
<age>22</age>
</person>
<person>
<first>Bill</first>
<last>Gates</last>
<age>46</age>
</person>
<person>
<first>Steve</first>
<last>Jobs</last>
<age>40</age>
</person>
</book>
invalidbooks.xml
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE book SYSTEM "books.dtd">
<book>
<person>
<first>Kiran</first>
<last>Pai</last>
<age>22</age>
</person>
<person>
<first>Bill</first>
<last>Gates</last>
<age>46</age>
</person>
<person>
<abc></abc>
</person>
<person>
<first>Steve</first>
<last>Jobs</last>
<age>40</age>
</person>
</book>
Java Program:
import java.io.IOException;
import javax.xml.parsers.ParserConfigurationException;
import javax.xml.parsers.SAXParser;
import javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory;
import org.xml.sax.Attributes;
import org.xml.sax.SAXException;
import org.xml.sax.SAXParseException;
import org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler;
public class SAXTest extends DefaultHandler
{
public void startElement(String namespaceURI, String sName, String qName, Attributes attrs)
{
System.out.println("<" + qName + ">");
}
public void endElement(String namespaceURI, String sName, String qName)
{
System.out.println("" + qName + ">");
}
public void error(SAXParseException e)throws SAXParseException
{
throw e;
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
DefaultHandler handler = new SAXTest();
SAXParserFactory factory = SAXParserFactory.newInstance();
factory.setValidating(true);
try
{
SAXParser parser = factory.newSAXParser();
System.out.println(parser.isValidating());
parser.parse("books.xml", handler);
}
catch (ParserConfigurationException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
catch (SAXException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
catch (IOException e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
